Posted in economy, politics, technology, tagged $2 dollar a day, 2012, 47 percent, accusations, American Dream, American way, Arab Spring, Australia, backbiting, badmouth, candidate, character defect, cohesion, community, competitive, Comptroller, consumer price index, consumers, country, crisis, culprits, David Walker, debt, deficit, democracy, Democrats, dialog, direction, division, Dong Tao, easy target, economy, efficient, election, emerging power, entitlement class, Europe, family, finance, financial aid, First World, free trade, fundraiser, future, gina rinehart, have nots, haves, help, incomes, individualism, insolvency, jobs, labor, lazy, living standards, low pay, middle class, minimum wage, Mitt Romney, money, nation, partisans, policy, political will, president, profits, pundits, questions, race to the bottom, raise all boats, real inflation, recession, Reform, regulations, Republicans, resentment, scapegoat, solution, stand together, sustainable, technology, Third World, threaten, trade for a new century, unemployment, unsustainable, USA, voters, wage loss, Wall Street, welfare state, West, whining, work, workforce, world markets on September 20, 2012 |
Leave a Comment »
She’s the world’s wealthiest woman you’ve never heard of and she’s saying something you probably wish you hadn’t: “Gina Rinehart, world’s richest woman, makes case for $2-a-day pay“,the Los Angeles Times reports.
The Australian mining heiress has a problem. The cost of running a mining operation in Australia cannot compete with Africans willing to work a continent away for $2 per day.
There’s a certain elementary logic to Rinehart’s argument. If the two nations are selling raw materials at vastly different prices because of vastly different costs of labor, her operation loses. In a worse-case scenario, it might not even make sense to go on operating. From Rinehart’s perspective, profit is the objective and benevolence is a job — never mind if the jobs she creates fails to compensate workers well enough to keep the lights on. She’s precariously positioned on that slippery slope so common to today’s political and trade debates: It could be worse: no jobs.
The world’s richest woman has a point. But it doesn’t pass the sustainable-future test.
(more…)
Read Full Post »
Posted in economy, tagged American, antitrust, bubble, bust, campaign finance, change, China, class, common ground, conflict, consumer, corporate personhood, corporatism, corruption, crony capitalism, demand, double-dip, economy, education, employment, export, free trade, free trade agreements, globalized, goods, government, Great Recession, growth, industry, jobs, labor, law, localism, middle class, movements, objectives, occupy wall street, outlook, personal responsibility, pragmatic, private, protectionist scares, protests, public, public accountability, Reform, relocalize, services, solutions, special interests, tea party, the real threat, US, worker on November 9, 2011 |
Leave a Comment »
If the headline-grabbing Occupy Wall Street movement proves anything, it is that Americans are gravely concerned about the state of our union.
Just as the Tea Party was regarded with suspicion in their initial rallies to reduce government bloat, throngs of leaderless Occupy Wall Street protesters have been derided for their all-over-the-map set of gripes: Wall Street traders who have funneled investors’ money not into the real economy but speculative gambles that have led to questionable lending practices, volatile commodities pricing and taxpayer bailouts; a higher education system that has become a financial albatross to indebted students; legislative favors aimed at Big Business, and widespread unemployment even among the young and the educated.
Arguably, Occupy Wall Street is to Big Business and Banks what the Tea Party is to Big Government and Waste — two sides of the same coin. Both groups — which for the purpose of this discussion are defined as principled participants not to be confused with their salacious or lawless detractors — grasp a large chunk of the problem.
To cure what ails us, Americans must reach for broader and more inclusive views and bigger and bolder solutions.
(more…)
Read Full Post »
Posted in economy, tagged agreement, austerity, author, billionaire, book, capital, Cassandras, Charlie Rose, competitive, consequences, consumer, contraction, contrarian, controversy, corporate mercantilism, corporations, correction, crash, credible, credit, currencies, cuts, dangers, debate, deficits, derivatives, disadvantage, disincentive, doomsayers, double dip recession, downturn, Dr. Doom, due, economy, effects, Elizabeth Warren, export, Financial Modernization Act, financial services industry, financial system, foretold, fragile, free trade, future, gambling, gap between the rich and the poor, GATT, Glass-Steagall Act, globalism, globalization, goldsmith, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Great Recession, grow, hindsight, IMF, incentive, industrialized, international, International Monetary Fund, investments, irrational exuberance, Jeremy Grantham, joblessness, jobs, liberalisation, liberalization, losses, Main Street, markets, meltdown, middle class, NAFTA, nations, new normal, New Trade Theory, Nouriel Roubini, oligarchy, outsource, parity, PBS, pendulum, perma-bear, Peter Schiff, playing field, predict, private interests, protect, reasons, recovery, Reform, regulations, risk, Robert R. Prechter, Robert Shiller, Senator Byron Dorgan, shift, stimulus, stock, struggle, tariff, TARP, theory, trade, trade deficits, trap, treaty, two-income trap, unemployment, volatility, Wall Street, workers, world, World Bank, World Trade Organization, WTO on July 28, 2010 |
Leave a Comment »
Giving credit where credibility is due.
Charlie Rose:
How do you see the economy today? The world economy? Where are we?
Answer:
I think the financial system is extremely fragile. I think that you can see it in the volatility of currencies; you can see all sorts of weaknesses. I believe that there is an incredible amount of danger in things like the derivatives. I think that we are moving toward the outer limits of acceptable risk taking. … I think our financial system is dangerous and could create great problems for the real economy. …
— Sir James Michael Goldsmith, billionaire financier, 1994; February 26, 1933 – July 18, 1997
(more…)
Read Full Post »
